THE PHOTOGRAPHER
Mr. Nhem En’s career in the Khmer Rouge began in 1970 at age 9 when he was recruited as a village boy to be a drummer in a touring revolutionary band. When he was 16, he said, he was sent to China for a seven-month course in photography. After this he became the chief of six photographers at Pol Pot’s secret prison S-21. He is the author of most of the pictures, that now hang in rows at the Tuol Sleng Museum of Genocide in Phnom Penh. The eyes of the victims in the pictures, so painfully directed at us are in fact pointed towards Mr. Nhem En, who in a New York Times interview, said:
They came in blindfolded, and I had to untie the cloth. I was alone in the room, so I am the one they saw. They would say: Why was I brought here? What am I accused of? What did I do wrong? ‘Look straight ahead. Don’t lean your head to the left or the right.’ That’s all I said. I had to say that so the picture would turn out well. Then they were taken to the interrogation center. The duty of the photographer was just to take the picture.’ (Seth Mydans, “Out From Behind a Camera at a Khmer Torture House”)
THE EXHIBITION (MoMA)
From May 15 to September 30, 1997, a selection of 22 headshot pictures from Tuol Sleng was displayed as “Photographs from S21: 1975-1979″, at MoMA, New York. The exhibition was organized by two American photographers, Chris Riley and Doug Niven, who discovered 6,000 original 6 x 6 cm negatives in a cabinet in Tuol Sleng and copyrighted possession of 100 of them. By exposing the pictures on the walls of an influential art museum, the pictures became disconnected from their history and what more important from their ability to animate the tragedy of those they depict. They turned into anonymous artifacts, aesthetically satisfying and emotionally powerful but lacking there function as traces of both their referents (victims) and the Cambodian Genocide. Only 22 pictures were exhibited, who did the selection? And what where the criteria? Todd Gitlin has compared the prospect of selecting which images to print and display to having to decide who was going to live or die – yet it is unclear if Gitlin means that those displayed have been saved. Instead, our looking at them may condemn them to a new death every time, since they are allowed to stand for nothing else. The photographs were largely presented as fine art, Riley and Niven also made several sets of art-quality prints for sale to collectors. One reviewer praised the photographer (who somehow unknown to MoMA at the time, was Nhem En) and compared him to Diane Arbus and Richard Avedon, writing that, “these starkly powerful photographs are as complex and human as any series of portraits.” A grand statement if not for the fact that they do not symbolize human tragedy but are proof of it. We must not forget that as much as they are images even beautiful ones, they foremost torture devices and testimonials of pain and atrocities.
References:
S. Mydans, “Out From Behind a Camera at a Khmer Torture House”, online at:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9805E1DA1231F934A15753C1A9619C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1
D. Hawk, The Photographic Record, in: K. Jackson (ed.), Cambodia 1975-1978: Rendezvous with Death, Princeton Univeristy Press, 1989.
T. Roma, Looking Into the Face of Our Own Worst Fears Through Photography in: The Chronicle of Higher Education, 44.10 (1997)